标签: 上海花千坊爱上海
The spring of the new car "algorithm school" is coming.
Cheating in the exam less than 10 days after admission, 3 freshmen were punished and 1 dropped out.
Three students were punished for cheating in the exam less than 10 days after they entered school. Among the three students, one student who was detained for probation chose to drop out of school and reread high school. This incident caused a sensation among the teachers and students of Tianjin University, and "shock" and "pity" became a common reflection.
Tracking: cheating in exams exposes lack of integrity
Not long ago, Tianjin University issued a disciplinary decision, which punished three freshmen of 2008 who cheated in the professional examination at the beginning of the semester, one with a serious warning and two with probation. The disciplinary decision was posted in front of the school office building, but the names of the three students were not disclosed. A warning was added to the disciplinary decision: recently, three students violated the Regulations on Undergraduate Management of Tianjin University and the Interim Provisions on Undergraduate Examination of Tianjin University, exposing some students’ moral deficiencies such as honesty. Honesty, trustworthiness and no fraud are the bottom line of Tiandeng’s professional ethics, and I hope everyone will take it as a warning.
Principal: Serious handling is strict for love.
President Gong Ke spoke frankly about the cheating of freshmen, calling it a disgrace. He said: "I sincerely hope that students will be brave after knowing shame!" "
"Less than 10 days after the freshmen of 2008 entered the school, such a serious examination violation occurred, which was seriously dealt with by the school discipline. As the principal, I am very sad!" Gong Ke, president of Tianjin University, said, "Honesty is the bottom line of human beings and the foundation of social fairness and harmony. As Tianjin University, which trains high-quality innovative talents, we have always adhered to the "double strictness" principle of "rigorous scholarship and strict teaching requirements" to cultivate the integrity of teachers and students, and there is no room for accommodation on the "bottom line". Cheating in exams is a reflection of students’ lack of honesty, which undermines the fairness and seriousness of school exams. If we are soft-hearted in dealing with this problem, it will not only affect the growth of students, damage the reputation of the school, but also’ cast’ a great disaster that will ruin the social atmosphere. "
"Tianjin University’s scholarship policy of" rigorous scholarship and strict teaching requirements "is aimed at every teacher and student at school, and no one can be an exception." Gong Ke said, "The seemingly harsh punishment of’ lax teaching and lazy teachers’ is not strict for’ strictness’, but strict for love. The’ double strictness’ has created the historical glory of Tianjin University and made millions of alumni who have made brilliant achievements in all walks of life. Tianjin University should and must be strict. This is responsible for the history of Tianjin University, for the national goal of cultivating innovative talents, and for the life of every university student! "
Academic Affairs Office: Examination discipline is the high-voltage line.
"In the process of understanding the situation, we found that some students developed bad habits such as cheating in exams and plagiarizing homework before entering the university, and they have never been punished accordingly, so they have a fluky psychology and think that they can do the same in the university." The relevant person in charge of the Academic Affairs Office of Tianjin University said, "In Tianjin University, examination discipline is a high-voltage line, so you can’t touch it!"
Teachers and students reflect: It’s really not worth it.
Freshmen who just entered the school were punished for violating the examination discipline, which caused quite a stir on the campus of Tianjin University, and "shock" and "pity" became common voices. "After studying hard for three years, I finally got into the university, but I was punished for cheating. It’s really worthless." A student of Tianjin University said.
"This is a lesson for everyone. Just knowing this, including college leaders, counselors and students, was shocked and touched each of us very much. " The counselor of the punished student said, "But calm down, this is not necessarily a’ bad thing’."
It is understood that after the incident, President Gong Ke had a face-to-face communication with the three punished freshmen.
"One of the students who was punished by staying in school chose to drop out of school and reread high school, but I still kept in touch with him and encouraged him to be admitted to his ideal university again. The other two students are very energetic at present, saying that they will correct their mistakes through hard work. " A counselor said, "These two students now have a goal, that is, to become an’ excellent student’ through their own efforts, and to walk into the principal’s office again as an’ excellent student’ and have a heart-to-heart talk with the principal!" (Liu Xiaoyan Meng Zhaoxi)
Editor: Wang Jiaolong
Crimes against the world are numerous-the beginning of American military hegemony
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, September 6th (international observation) Crimes against the world are numerous — — The beginning of American military hegemony
Xinhua News Agency reporter Liu Si Zhu Ruiqing
"This country was established through a ruthless and soul-destroying war. Only by recognizing this can we understand the past and present of the United States. " Holger Hawke, a German historian, wrote in The Scar of America: The War of Independence and the Violent Gene of American Politics.
The history of the founding and development of the United States coincides with its historical pace of war and expansion. Since its independence for more than 240 years, the United States, with its colonial genes and imperial dreams, has evolved from a new political power in a corner of North America to a global military hegemony through continuous wars and military expansion, and has used hegemony to bully and bully.
Countless facts tell the world that America’s military hegemonic behavior of bullying and usurping power violates the general trend of peace and development, brings great catastrophe and endless harm to many countries, is the main source of world unrest and the biggest challenge that threatens the civilization and progress of human society.
"Destiny is Destined by Heaven": Spiritual Hypothesis Supporting Hegemony
The United States boasts itself as a "city on the top of a mountain", while Americans regard themselves as "God’s voters" and think that the United States is a country with a "destiny". For hundreds of years, Americans have given so-called "legitimacy" and "sanctity" to American military expansion and hegemony.
According to the report "The Origin, Reality and Harm of American Military Hegemony" issued by Xinhua News Agency’s national high-end think tank (referred to as the report), the United States relied on force to expand continuously, and used the US-Mexico War and the Spanish-American War to expand westward and seaward. After two world wars, it rose to become a global superpower and formed a dominant unipolar hegemony after the Cold War. In the process of the United States moving towards global military hegemony, the theory of "Destiny by Heaven" has always provided a mental hypothesis and an excuse for action for the United States to develop and consolidate its military hegemony, and has constantly influenced American policies and behaviors — — It is not only the basis and excuse of using military means to expand territory and violently persecute aborigines in American history, but also the ideological root of the United States’ struggle for world dominance, exporting values and foreign military intervention since the 20th century.
George Herring, an American diplomatic scholar, once pointed out that from expelling Native Americans, seizing one-third of Mexico’s territory, colonizing Filipinos and Puerto Ricans, and invading Iraq in 2003, "the United States ‘ Great mission ’ The understanding has been used to rationalize its military expansion. "
In addition, Americans are constantly trying to find a theoretical basis for their own expansion behavior. Social Darwinists in the United States say that countries, like nature, follow the law of the jungle and the survival of the fittest. Scholars of international relations put forward hegemonic stability theory, democratic peace theory and so on, advocating that the unipolar system of the world led by the United States can bring lasting peace.
The report holds that, in fact, these arguments can’t stand the test of history and reality. No matter how they are changed, they are all theories that defend and serve the military hegemony and interests of the United States, and their core reflects the imperial thoughts of the United States of belligerence, expansion, intervention and moral whitewash.
Soft and Hard: Various Means to Maintain Hegemony
"War has become an inseparable part of this country’s history. Rather than saying that the United States has been at war since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, it is better to say that the war itself created the United States. The war fought by the United States has made the United States today and will also shape the future United States. " French historian Thomas Rabineau described the "unbreakable" relationship between the United States and the war.
War and military action are the most direct means for the United States to maintain its military hegemony. In its more than 240-year history, the United States has not fought for less than 20 years, making it the most combative country in the history of the world. Through successive wars, the United States laid military bases covering the whole world as strategic anchor points to control the world, regarded Latin American and Caribbean countries as "backyards", controlled the geopolitical throats of Eurasia such as the Middle East, deployed troops to Africa, and controlled important resources and raw materials by military means.
According to a 2021 study by Quincy Institute of Governing the Country, an American think tank, at present, the United States has 750 military bases in 80 overseas countries and regions, almost three times the number of American embassies, consulates and missions abroad, and the annual operating cost may be as high as 55 billion US dollars. Since 2001 alone, overseas military bases have supported the United States in launching wars or military operations in at least 25 countries.
The report pointed out that in order to maintain global military hegemony, the United States not only directly controls it by launching or intervening in wars, laying a global network of military bases, but also indirectly controls it by building an alliance system and using rules and mechanisms.
Marked by the establishment of NATO in 1949, the United States began to build a military alliance, and then established bilateral alliances such as the United States, the Philippines, the United States and Japan, and the United States and South Korea, in an attempt to gain the overall military strength advantage through alliance so as to deter opponents and realize their own political and security interests. Nowadays, more and more countries find that the alliance system is actually a tool for the United States to maintain military hegemony, and as an "ally", it has to obey the will of the United States. As Sevim Dagdelen, a member of the German Bundestag, said, "What the United States wants is not an ally, but a loyal servant."
Various rules and mechanisms are another important means of stealth control in the United States, such as using laws and regulations such as the Export Management Regulations and the Arms Export Control Law to build a dual-use and military export control system; Establish legislation in specific areas such as the Atomic Energy Law; Establish or lead multilateral mechanisms such as Paris Coordinating Committee, Missile Technology Control Regime and Wassenaar Arrangement. The existence of these international rules and mechanisms essentially serves American security interests.
In recent years, Americans have also concocted the phrase "rules-based international order" to beautify packaging hegemonism. Alexander gusev, director of the Russian Institute of Strategic Planning and Forecasting, pointed out that the United States deliberately keeps the definition of "rules-based international order" vague, because the less specific these so-called "rules" are, the more it can "dress up" them at will. Once a country violates the will of the United States, the United States will accuse it of "violating the rules" and there is reason to punish it.
Endless harm: the disaster caused by the abuse of hegemony
"We can have a special national flag — — Our country can do the same: we can just keep our usual national flag, paint the white stripes black and replace the stars with skull symbols. " In 1901, Mark Twain, an American writer, wrote such words to condemn the imperialist behavior of the United States in waging war and bloody slaughter in the Philippines.
The chariots driven by American military hegemony have brought endless harm. The war to conquer Indians directly wiped out millions of Indian population; In the colonial war in the Philippines, 200,000 to 1 million Filipinos died; In the Korean War, more than 3 million civilians died; In the Vietnam War, 2 million civilians died; In the Iraq war, 200,000 to 250,000 civilians died … … According to the figures released this year by Brown University’s "War Cost" project, after the "September 11" incident, the United States launched wars or "anti-terrorist actions" in at least 85 countries around the world, which directly led to more than 940,000 deaths, including 432,000 civilians, and 38 million people were displaced or became refugees.
As Walter Russell Meade, an American scholar and professor at Bard College, said, "The United States is the most dangerous military force in the history of the world."
American military behavior in the world not only directly caused huge humanitarian disasters, but also brought a series of complex social problems including social unrest, refugee tide, psychological trauma, ecological crisis and so on.
For example, the US military left about 350,000 tons of explosive bombs and mines in Vietnam, and it is estimated that it will still take 300 years to completely remove them. From 2002 to 2016, there were at least 270 environmental pollution incidents at three US military bases in Okinawa, Japan, most of which were not notified to the Japanese government. In May, 2022, the US military base in Longshan, which South Korea is recovering, was seriously polluted by exposed soil and groundwater. The Ministry of Environment of South Korea found that the total petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil of the dormitory site in Nanyingqu of the base exceeded the standard by 29 times, and the carcinogens benzene and phenol in the groundwater exceeded the standard by 3.4 times and 2.8 times respectively.
According to the data released by the Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs of Brown University in 2019, since the global war on terrorism in 2001, the US military has produced 1.2 billion tons of greenhouse gases in the process of equipment and deployment, combat operations, weapons manufacturing, etc. "It is one of the largest greenhouse gas emitters in the world".
American military hegemonic behavior has brought disasters to all countries in the world, but also brought serious trauma to the United States itself. Rabineau pointed out in the book "American War Culture" that almost every generation in the United States has swallowed the evil consequences of the political, economic and social chaos caused by the war.
According to the data of Brown University’s "War Cost" project, more than 7,000 American soldiers and about 8,000 American defense contractors were killed in the war launched by the United States after the "9.11" incident. More than 30,000 American soldiers committed suicide, which is four times the number of people killed in the battle. The sky-high military expenditure invested by the United States to maintain military hegemony has also put an increasingly heavy burden on American nationals. After 2001, the war-related expenditure in the United States has exceeded 5.8 trillion US dollars. More importantly, America’s military hegemony and foreign war acts have bred and encouraged extremist forces and self-consumed, and the "9.11" incident is a typical case.
"It is for the United States to build a country in war, expand in war and dominate in war." The report writes that the military expansion of the United States continues today, and American military hegemonism is still bullying and destroying the world we live together.
Five benefits of swimming
In the process of beauty swimming, the water temperature in the swimming pool will stimulate the blood vessels of the skin to contract and expand, thus accelerating blood circulation and making the skin rosy and shiny. When swimming, the skin will relax well under the friction of water waves, and it will remove excess keratin from the skin, making the skin look as smooth and white as a baby.
The research on lowering blood pressure shows that swimming can lower the blood pressure of the elderly and improve the arterial health, which is an ideal exercise mode.
Increasing vital capacity Because of the pressure of water, it increases the burden of inhalation, and the respiratory muscles will constantly overcome these pressures and increase their contractility, thus increasing their vital capacity. With the increase of vital capacity, the breathing volume of human body becomes larger, which is beneficial to energy consumption.
Weight loss swimming is an efficient way to lose weight. People who swim regularly have tight muscles and slender arms and legs than ordinary people.
Improving sleep quality Swimming is very effective in preventing and treating insomnia. Especially for brainworkers who often use their brains, swimming can relax the whole body and prevent insomnia and lack of energy caused by excessive brain use.
Multi-party trading scheme triggered the storm of players leaving the team
More than a month after the opening of the free trade market, the issue of the departure of Harden and Lillard has not been finalized. The Philadelphia 76ers are reluctant to trade Harden to the Clippers, which has caused widespread discussion among fans and the media. The American media put forward a set of four-party trading scheme, hoping to solve the demands of all parties. First, let’s take a look at the details of this four-party trading scheme. According to media reports, the program involves Philadelphia 76ers, Houston Rockets, Portland Trailblazers and Los Angeles Clippers. Philadelphia 76ers will get Lillard, Houston Rockets will get Ben Simmons of Philadelphia 76ers and mccollum of Portland Trailblazers, Portland Trailblazers will get Harden and harel of Clippers, while Clippers will get Kent Bezmore of Philadelphia 76ers and Nicholson of Portland Trailblazers. This trading scheme is indeed feasible. For the Philadelphia 76ers, they can get a top point guard, Lillard, which will further strengthen the team’s offensive strength and make it a Eastern powerhouse. The Houston Rockets can get Ben Simmons and mccollum, which will inject new vitality into the team and play a vital role in the future reconstruction. Portland Trailblazers can get Harden and harel, which will provide more offensive options for the team and enhance its competitiveness. The Clippers can get Bezmore and Nicholson, which will bring more outside firepower to the team. However, we can’t ignore the possible problems of this trading scheme. First of all, for the Philadelphia 76 ers,They may lose a young and promising player Ben Simmons, which may have a certain impact on the future development of the team. Secondly, Houston Rockets may need some time to adapt to the new system, and need to re-establish a team basketball style. Finally, this trading scheme may lead to the strength gap between teams becoming more obvious, which will lead to the imbalance of the league. To sum up, although this four-party trading scheme is feasible, there are also some problems and challenges.
After the NBA playoffs, there are many rumors. The most striking thing is the news about the trade between the Blazers and the Heat. According to reliable sources, the Trailblazers have successfully acquired Harden and Lori from the Houston Rockets, and at the same time, they have also won some promising draft picks. The Heat, on the other hand, bought a number of outstanding players and potential new stars at the expense of Lillard and nurkic. This transaction has undoubtedly brought great changes to the two teams. For the Blazers, the joining of Harden and Lori will greatly enhance their offensive strength. As one of the most dominant shooting guards in the league, Harden’s arrival will inject more firepower into the team. Lori is an excellent organizer and defender, and his leadership will play an important role in promoting the team. In addition, by gaining some potential draft picks, the Trailblazers also laid the foundation for future development. The Heat lost Lillard and nurkic in this transaction, but the players and draft picks they got also have great potential. Lillard is an excellent shooting guard, and his joining will fill the vacancy of Heat’s backcourt scoring. Nurkic is an excellent inside player, and his arrival will strengthen the team’s strength in rebounding and defensive end. In addition, by winning the draft pick, the Heat also have the opportunity to further improve their lineup in the future. This transaction is a victory for the Blazers and the Heat. Both sides have improved the strength and competitiveness of the team by introducing excellent players and potential new stars. At the same time, they also laid a solid foundation for future development.
The Portland Trailblazers got a chance to rebuild and the 76ers became younger. After the NBA playoffs in 2021, both the Portland Trailblazers and the Philadelphia 76ers encountered some difficulties. However, it also provides opportunities for the two teams to rebuild. This article will focus on how the Blazers use this opportunity to achieve reconstruction, and discuss how the 76ers can reshape the team through a younger lineup. For the Blazers, they need to re-examine the core composition of the team. Although Damian Lillard is the leader of the team, his performance in the playoffs has been unstable in the past few seasons. Therefore, the Blazers need to find a superstar who can partner with Lillard to enhance the team’s competitiveness. At the same time, they also need to strengthen the defensive end and improve the overall defensive efficiency. In order to achieve these goals, the pioneers can consider making some transactions. They can exchange some role players and future draft picks for a strong player, or try to sign free agents to supplement the lineup. In addition, they can also increase the depth of the team by cultivating young players. Through these measures, the blazers are expected to rebuild and challenge the western strong teams again next season. In contrast, the Philadelphia 76ers have begun the process of rejuvenation. They traded veteran Al Horford, won seth curry and Dolente Maze this season, bringing fresh blood to the team. In addition, the 76ers also have some young potential players, such as justin anderson and Thales Marks. By training these young players,The 76ers can gradually build a young and energetic lineup. However, it is not an easy task to achieve successful rejuvenation and reconstruction. Teams need to give young players enough time and opportunities to grow and develop. At the same time, the coaching team also needs to develop a tactical system suitable for young players to help them better adapt to the rhythm and intensity of the NBA. Portland Trailblazers and Philadelphia 76ers are both facing reconstruction opportunities. Through wise trading and training young players, these two teams are expected to reshape themselves and achieve better results in the next few seasons.
The Blazers and Heat pursued the championship, the Philadelphia 76ers became younger, and the Bulls failed to rebuild. These are the most concerned topics for fans in the current NBA league. Both the team’s efforts and the challenges they face have brought us a lot of enlightenment. First of all, let’s take a look at the efforts of the Blazers and the Heat to pursue the championship. Trailblazers have always been one of the top teams in the western region, but the championship is far from their vision. However, they did not give up, but improved their competitiveness by introducing excellent players and building a balanced lineup. Similarly, the Heat are constantly looking for a breakthrough, and they strengthen the team by trading and signing contracts. This kind of unremitting efforts and the pursuit of victory are worth learning and using for reference. At the same time, the Philadelphia 76ers chose the road of younger lineup. They believe that by cultivating young players and building a tacit team, they will be able to achieve greater success in the future. This long-term vision and confidence in the future have injected new vitality and hope into the team. Although they may not achieve brilliant results in a short time, this strategy of investing in the future is worthy of our affirmation. However, the bull suffered setbacks in the process of reconstruction. They used to be one of the most influential teams in the league, but they fell into a trough due to a series of wrong decisions and management mistakes. This story tells us that reconstruction is not smooth sailing and needs correct direction and decision-making. The failure of the bull reminds other teams to stay awake and alert at all times in the pursuit of success. All in all, the efforts of the Blazers and the Heat,The young lineup of Philadelphia 76ers and the failure of bull reconstruction have provided us with valuable experience and enlightenment. Whether it is a team or an individual, only by persistently pursuing the goal can we succeed. At the same time, correct decision-making and management are also crucial.
Two basketball superstars, Lillard and Harden, have recently expressed their desire to leave their original teams, and they are eager to pursue the dream of a championship. This news has aroused widespread concern and heated discussion among fans. For Lillard, he has always been the core player of Portland Trailblazers, and he is deeply loved by fans for his excellent scoring and leadership. However, for many years, the performance of the Trailblazers in the playoffs has never been satisfactory, which has given Lerade a desire for the championship. He hopes to join a more competitive team and cooperate with other superstars to compete for the championship and realize his basketball dream. Harden is the soul of Houston Rockets, and he has become the core of the team with his excellent scoring and organizational skills. However, in the past few seasons, the Rockets repeatedly hit a wall in the playoffs, unable to break through the defense lines of the western strong teams, which made Harden doubt the team’s prospects. He is eager to join a more competitive team and cooperate with other top players for the championship. The two superstars’ willingness to leave caused the fans to think. They believe that for a player, winning the championship in his career is a crucial honor and an affirmation of his basketball career. Although staying in the original team may give players more opportunities for personal and team development, if the team cannot provide enough competitiveness and opportunities, leaving is a better choice for them to realize their dreams. However, some people questioned Lillard and Harden’s decision. They believe that as the core players of the team, they should assume the responsibility of leading the team to rebuild.Instead of choosing to escape from the predicament. After all, basketball is a collective sport, and only through the efforts and unity of the whole team can we succeed. Lillard’s and Harden’s willingness to leave caused a heated discussion among the fans. Whether they choose to stay in the original team or seek new opportunities, we all hope that they can realize their basketball dreams and bring more exciting games to the fans.
Harden is determined to leave the rocket, and may play a small temper. The news caused an uproar in the basketball world. As the core player of Houston Rockets, Harden’s departure is undoubtedly a huge blow to the team. However, we can’t just blame it on his small temper, but should deeply analyze the reasons behind it. First of all, Harden’s departure may be due to the team’s lack of competitiveness. In recent years, although the Rockets often qualify for the playoffs, they always lose their combat effectiveness at critical moments. This undoubtedly made Harden feel depressed and disappointed. As a top player, he is eager to win more honors and titles, but the current state of the Rockets can’t meet his expectations. Secondly, Harden may also be troubled by interpersonal relationships. In the past few seasons, Harden’s relationship with teammate chris paul has attracted much attention. The friction and contradiction between them may have influenced Harden’s decision. If there is a problem with the unity and harmony within the team, the overall performance of the team will inevitably be affected, leading to the core players choosing to leave. In addition, Harden may have been tempted by other teams. In the NBA, strong teams compete for top players from time to time. If other teams can offer better contracts and more attractive competitive conditions, then Harden may choose to leave the Rockets. After all, every player wants to get the best treatment and opportunity. Whether because of competitiveness, interpersonal relationship or other reasons, Harden decided to leave the Rockets. We can’t simply attribute it to his small temper. As a fan,We should understand and respect the players’ choices. Harden’s departure is undoubtedly a challenge for the Rockets, but it is also a new starting point. The team needs to re-evaluate its own problems and find new directions and strategies.
Thank you for reading this article. We look forward to seeing the Blazers and the Heat perform better in future competitions. This transaction has undoubtedly brought great changes to the two teams, and we will continue to pay attention to their development.
Martin Sr: I used to think McGrady was crazy to get 74 points in two games. Now Harden has 60 points and triple doubles in a single game.
Live on August 5 th Recently, former NBA player Kenyon Martin talked about the evolution of the game in George’s podcast program.
Martin said: "When I was in the Nets, we played magic, and McGrady scored 74 points in two days. At that time, I thought it was crazy. I’m defending him, but he can score every goal. He scored 74 points in just two games.
"Now people get 71 points, 60 points and 65 points in a single game. At that time, McGrady scored very well. He was the scoring champion. But now it is a new alliance, and Harden has also won a triple double of 60 points. "
In 2018, Harden scored 60 points, 10 rebounds and 11 assists in the game against Magic.
Tuesday’s transfer gossip: Ronaldo, Badiashile, Nunes, Bellingham, Felix, Mudryk
Cristiano Ronaldo has a clause in his Al Nassr contract allowing the Portugal forward, 37, to join Newcastle United on loan if they qualify for the Champions League this season. (Marca)
France centre-back Benoit Badiashile, 21, is in London to undergo a medical after Chelsea agreed a deal worth 38m euros (£33.6m) with Monaco. (Football London)
Liverpool are exploring a deal to buy Portugal midfielder Matheus Nunes, 24, from Wolves in the summer. (Telegraph)
England midfielder Jude Bellingham, 19, is set to meet with Borussia Dortmund officials before 6 January, when he will inform them of his desire to leave this summer. The German club will seek 100m euros (£88.5m), plus add-ons that could take his total fee to about 140m euros (£124m). (AS)
Arsenal, Manchester United and Chelsea have been approached about signing Portugal forward Joao Felix, 23, on loan but Atletico Madrid are seeking a 15m euro loan fee (£13.3m), plus 6m euros (£5.3m) to cover his wages. (Athletic – subscription required)
Chelsea, meanwhile, are in negotiations over the structure of a club record deal to sign 21-year-old Argentina midfielder Enzo Fernandez from Benfica. (Evening Standard)
Arsenal have submitted a second offer for Ukraine winger Mykhailo Mudryk, thought to be significantly below Shakhtar Donetsk’s asking price of 100m euros (£88.5m). (ESPN)
Manchester United and Bayern Munich are interested in Randal Kolo Muani but Eintracht Frankfurt want 60-70m euros (£53-62m) for the France forward, 24. (Nicolo Schira)